Researcher · Tokyo

How should AI know
what it has earned?

I study the methods that turn AI-assisted exploration into scientific and mathematical claims proportionate to the evidence.

  1. 01 Evidence
  2. 02 AlphaScience
  3. 03 Calibration
  4. 04 Mathematics
  5. 05 Collaborate

01 · Begin with the evidence

Exploration is not yet a claim.

AI can produce plausible analyses faster than science can validate them. The first task is to preserve what was actually observed—including weak, ordinary, incomplete and negative results.

  • Evidence states
  • Bounded claims
  • Negative results

02 · AlphaScience

A ledger before a manuscript.

AlphaScience routes exploratory trajectories into explicit evidence-ledger states before they become manuscript-facing claims. Human supervision remains where judgment changes what the evidence can support.

Visit the project site ↗

03 · The calibration turn

Match the strength of the claim to the strength of the evidence.

Claim calibration is not an editorial cleanup step. It belongs inside the research loop: support, downgrade, redirect or stop—before fluency hardens uncertainty into narrative.

The Calibration Turn in AI-Assisted Research ↗

04 · AI mathematics

Beyond answers and proof verification.

Real mathematical research also depends on method selection, reusable intermediate results, novelty and resource constraints. I study how a methodology given to AI changes the path—and the value—of its mathematical work.

  • Method choice
  • Reusable progress
  • Novelty

05 · Work together

Build AI research systems that know their limits—and extend them.

I am a researcher at Institute of Science Tokyo and a visiting researcher at the University of Tokyo. I welcome conversations on AI for science, AI mathematics and evaluator design.